Food Firms Told To Cut Salt In Popular Dishes

Food companies will be asked to put less salt in popular dishes such as sandwiches and chips as part of a new government drive.

The campaign aims to reduce people's salt consumption by a quarter, reducing their daily intake from an 8.1g a-day average to 6g.

Public Health Minister Anna Soubry launched the new strategy which will set food companies lower targets for the amount of salt they put in their foods.

New maximum targets will be set for popular dishes and the catering and takeaway sector should "do more" to reduce salt quantities, the Department of Health said.

The department said it wanted more companies to sign up to the Government's salt reduction strategy under the Responsibility Deal.

It comes after a 2012 ComRes poll of 1,805 English adults showed that more than half the public (53%) rarely or never consider the amount of salt when buying food, despite more than four in five people (86%) knowing too much salt is bad for their health.

Firms will be asked to change recipes of popular dishes such as sandwiches

Ms Soubry said: "The voluntary approach is working and we have already seen results in our everyday foods, but to get the greatest impact, we need more companies pledging to reduce salt levels, particularly in the catering and take away sector."

Responsibility Deal Food Network chair Dr Susan Jebb said: "It's essential we maintain momentum in our efforts to reduce salt in our diet if we are to prevent the many thousands of premature deaths each year from stroke and heart disease linked to eating too much salt."

Consumer campaign group Which? called on the Government to "name and shame" companies who do not sign up to new salt targets and to change the law if voluntary action fails.

Richard Lloyd, Which? executive director, said: "The Government needs to establish these new salt reduction targets as soon as possible, name and shame companies which don't respond and be prepared to legislate if voluntary action fails."

14.47 | 0 komentar | Read More

Pound Falls To Another Low Against Dollar

The pound has continued to fall against the dollar, hitting a level last seen in the early days of the Coalition.

It fell to $1.4868 on Monday, after slipping below $1.49 for the first time in more than two and a half years on Friday.

The last time it was at this level was around the time of the General Election in 2010, and during the recession of 2008/2009.

The slide highlights the differing fortunes of two of the world's largest economies.

Last week, the US economy was given a boost when its jobless rate fell to 7.7% - the lowest since December 2008.

But concerns that the UK is heading for a triple dip recession remain, following a string of weak economic data and the downgrading of its credit rating by Moody's.

Sterling has been one of the worst performing major currencies this year, falling by around 8.5% against the dollar and 7% against the euro to date.

It also lost ground against the euro on Monday, which was up 0.3% against sterling at 87.34p.

Market analyst Nawaz Ali from Western Union said the falls come as investors prepare themselves for next week's Budget.

"The overriding concern is that the Government is giving little indication that it will take its foot off austerity which is hurting economic growth," he said.

He said speculation is also mounting that Chancellor George Osborne may announce a review of the Bank of England's remit.

"Investors are eyeing a change to the bank's inflation targeting, which may give Governor King and the incoming Mark Carney more room to explore new monetary stimulus," he added.

More quantitative easing is likely to hit sterling further because it increases its supply and drives its exchange value lower.

The currency movements came the day before industrial and manufacturing data for January, both of which are expected to show little or no growth over the month.

14.47 | 0 komentar | Read More

Danger As Electrical Product Recalls Ignored

Millions of potentially deadly electrical appliances are sitting in homes around the country despite attempts to recall the products, consumers are being warned.

The Electrical Safety Council (ESC) says one person is killed every seven days by an electrical accident and 350,000 people are injured annually, partly because of a "shockingly low" response to product alerts.

The charity found the average success rate of a product recall is just 10%-20%.

With 266 product recalls in the last six years and manufacturers making hundreds of thousands of items, it is thought millions of dangerous items stay in people's homes.

Research by the ESC shows almost two million adults have knowingly ignored a recall notice and a further one million admit owning an electrical item that has been recalled.

The researchers also found many consumers would jeopardise their safety if sending back a recalled product was too inconvenient or meant going without a luxury item such as a television or hair straighteners.

The ESC is launching an online tool that will allow users to quickly and easily discover if they own an electrical product that has been recalled.

The charity's Emma Apter said: "The small inconvenience of returning a recalled item is worth it when you consider that faulty products can electrocute or cause a fire.

"We firmly believe that there is more that retailers and manufacturers can do to help ensure customers are aware when a product has been recalled, and what to do if they need to return an item."

14.47 | 0 komentar | Read More

'Mummy Tax': Benefit Changes Criticised

By Tadhg Enright, Business Correspondent

The new Archbishop of Canterbury has chosen Mother's Day to fire a warning to the Government over planned cuts to welfare.

In his first significant intervention since being appointed, the Most Rev Justin Welby is among 43 bishops who have written an open letter condemning changes to the benefit system.

He warned that "children and families will pay the price" if the plans go ahead in their current form.

The Welfare Benefits Up-rating Bill will cap benefit rises at 1% a year until 2016.

Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith, who is attempting to steer the reforms through Parliament, has said they are needed to help get spending "back under control" and create a fairer deal for taxpayers.

But the archbishop, who will be formally enthroned at Canterbury Cathedral on March 21, said the legislation would remove the protection given to families against the rising cost of living and could push 200,000 children into poverty.

His predecessor, Dr Rowan Williams, was strongly criticised for expressing his views about Government policy.

The Most Rev Justin Welby has criticised the planned reforms

Faith and communities minister Baroness Warsi told Sky's Dermot Murnaghan: "The Government takes seriously the concerns the church raises.

"But we are in very difficult circumstances and we have to make some tough decisions. And at a time when people's incomes are frozen and not going up in line with inflation, it is also right that we look at the possibility of freezing benefits."

Meanwhile, the Prime Minister had a Mother's Day card delivered to his door by campaigners for new mums whose benefits are about to be capped.

Labour has accused the Government of imposing a "mummy tax" and said the welfare reforms are part of a series of austerity measures which unfairly target mothers.

Shadow minister for women Yvette Cooper MP told Sky News: "It's like David Cameron and George Osborne have a blindspot about women because they're paying three times more than men in tax and benefit and pay and pension changes.

"That is so unfair when women earn less and own less than men.

"It shows that the Prime Minister and the Chancellor just don't get it and it's outrageous that new mums are hurt hardest."

Around 340,000 women claim either statutory maternity pay or maternity allowance every year.

Until now their benefits have gone up in line with inflation, which currently stands at 2.7%, according to the Consumer Price Index.

Yvette Cooper has slammed the benefit cap

But from next month new mothers' benefits will go up by just 1% every year as part of a three-year cap on welfare increases.

So by 2015 critics have calculated the benefits will be effectively cut by £180 because they will not increase by as much as the cost of living will.

Schools minister, Liberal Democrat David Laws MP, defended the planned welfare reforms and said the Coalition had tried to help those on lower incomes.

He told Murnaghan: "We've had a public sector pay freeze. We've also had a 1% cap in the future on public sector pay. So we've have had to take difficult decisions not just for some of those on lower incomes but for everybody in society.

"And actually we've tried to help some of those on lower incomes by raising the tax free personal allowance and also exempting some of the lowest paid public sector workers from the effects of the pay freeze."

A spokeswoman for the Department for Work and Pensions said: "In difficult economic times we've protected the incomes of pensioners and disabled people, and most working age benefits will continue to increase 1%.

"This was a tough decision but it's one that will help keep the welfare bill sustainable in the longer term. By raising the personal allowance threshold, we've lifted two million people out of tax altogether, clearly benefiting people on a low income."

Single mum-to-be Helen Mockridge has one clear suggestion for a better way to reduce the deficit.

"Taxing really rich people, obviously, that's where the money should come from," she said.

"For me it's a real no-brainer and it makes me really angry that certain parts of society are very, very wealthy and the gap between rich and poor is getting bigger.

"That's where the money should be coming from, not from single mothers or the disabled or any other vulnerable group."

14.47 | 0 komentar | Read More

Coalition Seeks To Deliver Posties’ Share Plan

The Government is accelerating plans to privatise Royal Mail by canvassing external advisers to run a share scheme that will give the postal operator's 145,000 employees a stake in the company.

I have learnt that ministers at the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) last week launched a tender process to recruit an administrator for the staff share ownership programme, heralding what will be the largest privatisation for 30 years.

Advisers are expected to be appointed in the coming weeks. The chosen party will be responsible for overseeing the placement of at least 10% of Royal Mail's shares in the hands of its staff, fulfilling a commitment made by the Government as part of its plan to inject private capital into the company.

The adviser will also oversee the necessary back-office infrastructure to supervise the scheme, insiders said.

Sky News revealed last month that Michael Fallon, the Business Minister overseeing the privatisation plans, has asked officials to devise an employee equity scheme designed to avoid the process of 'stagging', which blighted the huge privatisations of the 1980s under Margaret Thatcher. Stagging is the term given to those who buy or receive shares at the offer price of a flotation and then sell them immediately into the market.

It is unclear how long Royal Mail employees would be obliged to hold onto their shares but experts say it would be likely to be for a period of several months at least.

Officials pointed out that by setting a floor for employee share ownership of 10%, they were preparing for the largest statutory commitment to staff participation of any UK Government privatisation.

The sell-off plan, which would be the largest since BT was privatised in 1984, could take the form of a sale to a single buyer or, more likely, a stock market listing that would place Royal Mail on the cusp of the FTSE-100.

Under the Postal Services Act passed in 2011, the Government cannot sell a single share in Royal Mail until it has made provisions for workers to own a stake in the company.

A team of officials from BIS and the Shareholder Executive, which oversees the management of state-owned companies, is working for Mr Fallon on the employee share offering.

The plans are not yet finalised but senior Government sources confirmed that an 'anti-stagging' clause was likely to be included in the scheme to avoid the prospect of millions of pounds-worth of additional shares being dumped in the market as soon as the listing takes place.

Under Moya Greene, Royal Mail's Canadian chief executive, the company has been discussing the company's prospects with potential investors in the UK, Canada and the US as it tries to familiarise fund managers with its financial performance.

Ms Greene, who joined about two years ago, has been cutting thousands of jobs as part of a move to automate many of Royal Mail's processes and modernise the company. Her actions have caused some tensions with trade unions, but their hostility to a privatisation process appears to have eased in the context of previous efforts.

The company's efforts have begun to pay off, with operating profit increasing from £12m to £144m in the six months to September 2012, on the back of a surge in demand for sending parcels as consumers switch their buying habits to online retailers.

A BIS spokesman declined to comment.

14.47 | 0 komentar | Read More

Apprenticeships: Cameron's Pledge On Training

David Cameron will today pledge to make it the "new norm" for school leavers to take an apprenticeship or go to university.

The Prime Minster wants the country to follow Germany's lead where work-based training sits alongside higher education as the automatic options considered by teenagers when they finish their exams.

During a visit to a training academy in Buckinghamshire to mark the start of National Apprenticeship Week, Mr Cameron will call on employers, schools and colleges, and his own ministers to expand apprenticeship opportunities for young people.

The Government will formally respond to the Richard Review, which has looked at ways to improve the quality of apprenticeships, later this week.

Mr Cameron said: "Apprenticeships are at the heart of our mission to rebuild the economy, giving young people the chance to learn a trade, to build their careers, and create a truly world-class, high-skilled workforce that can compete and thrive in the fierce global race we are in.

"There are record numbers of people taking up an apprenticeship, with a million starting one in the last few years. And as we take forward the Richard Review, our drive to reform and strengthen apprenticeships, raising standards and making them more rigorous and responsive to the needs of employers - means that an apprenticeship is increasingly seen as a first choice career move.

"But we need to challenge ourselves to go even further, that is why I want it to be the new norm for young people to either go to university or into an apprenticeship. We need to look at how we can expand apprenticeship opportunities so that they are available to all young people who are ready and eager to take them up, and aspire to get ahead in life."

Barclays is launching a new programme to help get 10,000 people into work

Barclays is launching a new nationwide scheme today to support 10,000 young people into work. The Barclays Bridges Into Work programme will see local Barclays teams matching up suitable apprentices and businesses in their area.

In addition, it is doubling the number of apprentices that it is recruiting into its own workforce to 2,000 specifically helping young people in long-term unemployment with little or no qualifications into permanent and fully paid jobs.

British Airways has said it will recruit up to 200 apprentices across a variety of different departments this year, covering engineering, operations, IT, finance and project management courses.

Meanwhile, a new study has revealed fewer than one in five parents believe apprenticeships have the same status as university education.

The survey of 400 working parents by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development also showed that almost half thought apprenticeships were more appropriate for manual or blue-collar jobs.

A report by the Centre for Economics and Business Research showed that apprenticeships are forecast to contribute £3.4bn a year to the economy through productivity gains by 2022.

The number of people completing apprenticeships is predicted to increase from 260,000 in the current financial year, to 480,000 by 2022, said the report.

Shadow business secretary Chuka Umunna said: "We are proud to be celebrating National Apprenticeships Week, launched by Labour in government and now in its sixth year.

"However, the recent fall in the number of apprenticeships for under 19s is greatly concerning, as well as recent evidence showing that one in five apprentices say they are not receiving training and that many are not being paid. Ministers need to get a grip and back Labour's plans for more, better quality apprenticeships."

14.47 | 0 komentar | Read More

US Boom: Jobs Jump By 236,000 In February

The number of people hired in the United States by non-farm employers jumped by 236,000 in February, exceeding expectations.

The unemployment rate also dropped to 7.7% from 7.9% in January, the lowest level since December 2008.

The Obama administration said it is evidence that the economic recovery is "gaining traction".

New jobs have averaged more than 200,000 per month since November last year.

Wages have increased and the gains were broad-based, led by the best construction hiring in six years.

New construction jobs continue to build up the US economy

But there was one negative detail in the government's February employment report.

Employers added fewer jobs in January than first estimated.

Job gains were lowered to 119,000 from an initially reported 157,000.

However, December hiring was a little better than first thought, with 219,000 jobs added instead of 196,000.

The upbeat figures saw a strengthening of the dollar, with Sterling sliding beneath the $1.49 figure.

Many economists expected hiring to fall in early 2013 largely due to the ongoing uncertainty surrounding the US budget, higher tax rates and looming federal spending cuts that took effect in March.

Yet the latest jobs report indicates job creation is speeding up.

However, early 2011 and 2012 also saw hiring jumps only to see the figures die back as the year went on.

White House economist Alan Krueger noted in a statement that the new unemployment rate was measured before $85bn (£56bn) in automatic budget cuts started taking effect.

The administration has warned that the cuts could have a negative impact on employment and economic growth.

It is urging Congress to move toward a "sustainable federal budget" by closing tax loopholes, enacting entitlement reforms and cutting spending.

14.47 | 0 komentar | Read More

'Mummy Tax': Cameron Under Fire Over Cuts

By Tadhg Enright, Business Correspondent

David Cameron will have a mother's day card delivered to his door by campaigners for new mums whose benefits are about to be capped.

Labour has accused the Government of imposing a "mummy tax" and said the welfare reforms are part of a series of austerity measures which unfairly target mothers.

Shadow minister for women Yvette Cooper MP told Sky News: "It's like David Cameron and George Osborne have a blindspot about women because they're paying three times more than men in tax and benefit and pay and pension changes.

"That is so unfair when women earn less and own less than men.

"It shows that the Prime Minister and the Chancellor just don't get it and it's outrageous that new mums are hurt hardest."

Yvette Cooper says the changes are unfair

Around 340,000 women claim either statutory maternity pay or maternity allowance every year.

Until now their benefits have gone up in line with inflation which currently stands at 2.7% according to the Consumer Price Index.

But from next month new mothers' benefits will go up by just 1% every year as part of a three-year cap on welfare increases.

So by 2015 critics have calculated the benefits will be effectively cut by £180 because they will not increase by as much as the cost of living will.

Conservative MP Amber Rudd said: "The fact is there are so many good things we are doing to try to help mothers.

"What mothers really want is welfare that works, improved education and jobs.

"That's what they talk to me about on the doorstep and I feel this Government is doing a lot on that front.

"And it's rank hypocrisy of Labour to accuse us on this front when they have made no suggestions about how to reduce the deficit."

Single mum-to-be Helen Mockridge has one clear suggestion for a better way to reduce the deficit.

"Taxing really rich people, obviously, that's where the money should come from," she said.

"For me it's a real no-brainer and it makes me really angry that certain parts of society are very, very wealthy and the gap between rich and poor is getting bigger.

"That's where the money should be coming from, not from single mothers or the disabled or any other vulnerable group."

14.47 | 0 komentar | Read More

Vince Cable: Tories Waging 'Economic Jihad'

Vince Cable has accused right-wing Conservatives of waging "idealogical jihad" on public spending and warned that the Liberal Democrats would block efforts to implement some cuts.

Speaking at a fringe event on the eve of the party's spring conference in Brighton, the Business Secretary also warned that Tory efforts to reduce immigration were "causing a great deal of harm to the economy".

He said: "What we have to make absolutely clear is that there is a difference between managing public spending, controlling public spending in that context - having that financial discipline - and the kind of thing that a lot of right-wing Conservatives are wishing for, which is a kind of British Tea Party.

"A kind of ideological jihad against public spending and public services."

Kicking-off the gathering on Friday, party leader Nick Clegg denied the Lib Dems were in crisis in the wake of sexual harassment allegations and the conviction of ex-Cabinet minister Chris Huhne.

Deputy PM Nick Clegg admitted the party had 'let people down'

But the Deputy Prime Minister did admit the party had recently "let people down" and needed to take a "long, hard look in the mirror".

He said: "No doubt you will be aware of the recent allegations that have been made about sexual harassment in our party.

"When concerns were brought to the attention of members of my team we acted to address them.

"But this should not have just been the responsibility of a few individuals acting with the best of intentions.

"It must be the responsibility of the party as a whole to make sure we have the processes and support structures in place now and in the future.

Disgraced MP Chris Huhne was praised for his constituency record

"We didn't, and as a result we let people down. Liberal Democrats, that is not acceptable to me."

Delegates gave disgraced former Energy and Climate Change Secretary Huhne a round of applause after Baroness Shirley Williams praised his record as a constituency MP.

She described as "domestic tragedy" the situation of Huhne and Vicky Pryce, his ex-wife, who was found guilty of perverting the course of justice after she took speeding points on his behalf.

"We can only say of them that this is a tragedy that sometimes overcomes people; not least those in public life," she told the conference.

The party is bracing itself for showdowns with activists next week over so-called secret courts legislation and the coalition's economic strategy.

Labour has also challenged Mr Clegg to break coalition ranks by supporting the introduction of a mansion tax - long favoured by Lib Dems - in a Commons vote next week.

14.47 | 0 komentar | Read More

Cameron's Speech Rebuked By Fiscal Watchdog

David Cameron has been rebuked by the Office for Budget Responsibility about the impact of his Government's austerity measures on economic growth.

In a high-profile speech on Thursday, the Prime Minister said the OBR was "absolutely clear that the deficit reduction plan is not responsible" for depressed growth, adding "in fact, quite the opposite".

But the head of the independent fiscal watchdog has written to Mr Cameron saying he misrepresented its position.

Chairman Robert Chote wrote to Number 10, disputing the claims.

He insisted that it believed there was a short-term effect and that "fiscal consolidation measures have reduced economic growth over the past couple of years".

The strong retort from the watchdog came in response to a passage from the Prime Minister's speech which he used to insist there was "no alternative" to the Government's strategy.

"There's not some choice between dealing with our debts and planning for growth," he said.

"As the independent Office for Budget Responsibility has made clear growth has been depressed by the financial crisis, the problems in the eurozone and a 60% rise in oil prices between August 2010 and April 2011.

"They are absolutely clear that the deficit reduction plan is not responsible. In fact, quite the opposite."

But the OBR published a letter sent to Number 10 on Friday by Mr Chote in which he took exception to the claims.

"For the avoidance of doubt, I think it is important to point out that every forecast published by the OBR since the June 2010 Budget has incorporated the widely-held assumption that tax increases and spending cuts reduce economic growth in the short term."

He added that an impact of "external inflation shocks, deteriorating export markets and financial sector and eurozone difficulties were more likely explanations" than incorrect multipliers for the reason growth was even weaker that initially forecast.

A Downing Street spokesman said: "The OBR has today again highlighted external inflation shocks, the eurozone and financial sector difficulties as the reasons why their forecasts have come in lower than expected.

"That is precisely the point the Prime Minister was underlining."

14.47 | 0 komentar | Read More